[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2019-01-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43072 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 15 22:18:55 2019 New Revision: 267953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267953&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-15 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/43072 * resolve

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-05-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 04:28 --- Fixed. Thanks, Joost! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-05-09 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-09 20:19 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Same as 41113 - I'll decide what to do tonight - see you on #gfortran? PR41113 is closed as fixed - can this be closed as well? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 05:44 --- Subject: Bug 43072 Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 22 05:43:57 2010 New Revision: 156949 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156949 Log: 2010-02-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/43072 * dep

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-21 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com 2010-02-21 10:43 --- Subject: Re: unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a)) Same as 41113 - I'll decide what to do tonight - see you on #gfortran? Paul On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:48 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > >

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 21:48 --- Can this PR be closed? I think it is fixed now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43072

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 12:47 --- Subject: Bug 43072 Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 20 12:46:43 2010 New Revision: 156926 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156926 Log: 2010-02-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/36932 PR fo

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 15:46 --- (In reply to comment #2) I have just patched a tree with the fix for PR36932 on an i686 at work. None of these temporaries appear! Something is different between 32 and 64 bits.. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-14 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-15 07:58 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Yes, indeed. > > In fact, S2((/(real (i),i=1,2)/)) produces calls to pack and unpack in both S0 > and S1. > > I'll take a look at it. You did beat me again, I wanted to file the following te

[Bug fortran/43072] unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))

2010-02-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-15 07:51 --- Yes, indeed. In fact, S2((/(real (i),i=1,2)/)) produces calls to pack and unpack in both S0 and S1. I'll take a look at it. Thanks Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed