http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43179
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43179
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-05
17:37:33 UTC ---
With trunk at revision 183904 or with 4.6.2, I get
pr43179.f90:6.14:
if (allocated(foo(1)%a)) call abort()
1
Error: 'array' argument of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43179
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-30
02:39:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
OK for trunk with the usual embellishments of ChangeLogs and testcase?
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-18 07:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
This fixes it and regtests.
+ if (array-expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE array-expr_type !=
EXPR_FUNCTION)
The patch looks OK, but actually I fail to see when
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 21:57 ---
Spin-off: PR44960
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43179
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 15:42 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
OK for trunk with the usual embellishments of ChangeLogs and testcase?
Yes, if you have an example for EXPR_FUNCTION - otherwise I would claim that
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
OK for trunk with the usual embellishments of ChangeLogs and testcase?
Yes, if you have an example for EXPR_FUNCTION - otherwise I would claim that
EXPR_VARIABLE is enough.
Paul, any
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 10:26 ---
gfortran already bails out with:
Error: Allocate-object at (1) is not a nonprocedure pointer
or an allocatable variable
If you are already patching, can you also improve the wording for this old
error
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 07:35 ---
This fixes it and regtests.
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 157061)
--- gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 07:54 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This fixes it and regtests.
+ if (array-expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE array-expr_type !=
EXPR_FUNCTION)
The patch looks OK, but actually I fail to see when an EXPR_FUNCTION is valid
in
10 matches
Mail list logo
