--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:38 ---
Paul, is there anything left to do here or can this PR be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43266
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 04:32 ---
Fixed. Thanks, Tobias.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-24 12:29 ---
Subject: Bug 43266
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 24 12:29:23 2010
New Revision: 158687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158687
Log:
2010-04-24 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 19:07 ---
Subject: Bug 43266
Author: pault
Date: Tue Apr 20 19:07:14 2010
New Revision: 158570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158570
Log:
2010-04-20 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 15:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=20231)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20231action=view)
Fix for the PR
Bootstraps and regtests on FC9/x86_64
Paul
--
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 15:11 ---
For completeness: The test case was based on a post at
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f5ec99089ea72b79
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43266
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-27 18:45 ---
Replacing the gcc_assert with
if (!overriding || !overriding-n.tb)
return FAILURE;
Fixes the problem. This looks like one ICE too far :-)
It might be best, I suppose, to limit the above to overriding
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 09:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=20026)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20026action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43266
