[Bug fortran/45309] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/trim_optimize_1.f90 has 4 memmove

2010-08-22 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-22 17:10 --- I'm seeing the failure now at revision 163459. -- mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45309] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/trim_optimize_1.f90 has 4 memmove

2010-08-22 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-22 19:45 --- The patch for PR45380 fixes this. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45380 *** -- mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45309] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/trim_optimize_1.f90 has 4 memmove

2010-08-17 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 14:14 --- Confirmed (from my point of view) -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45309] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/trim_optimize_1.f90 has 4 memmove

2010-08-17 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 16:44 --- I'm somewhat out of date (revision 163221) and I only see 2 memmoves. I don't see any string_trim either. Note that the -O option changes the original tree dump. I thought it only impacted later dumps. --

[Bug fortran/45309] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/trim_optimize_1.f90 has 4 memmove

2010-08-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 17:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) Note that the -O option changes the original tree dump. I thought it only impacted later dumps. OK, with -O I also only get (MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})b] = MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})abcd];,