--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:52 ---
Fixed with r164305. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:50 ---
Subject: Bug 45577
Author: janus
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:50:15 2010
New Revision: 164305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164305
Log:
2010-09-15 Janus Weil
PR fortran/45577
* reso
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45577
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-08 18:08 ---
If I revert the patch in comment #5 from revision 164002, compiling the code in
comment #6 gives a segmentation fault.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45577
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-08 15:52 ---
The following code reduced from
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/76f99e7fd4f3e772#
module type2_type
implicit none
type, abstract :: Type2
character :: typeName*(30) = "
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-08 14:46 ---
> Here is a better patch: ...
Yes! it accepts
program main
type b_obj
integer,allocatable :: c(:)
real :: r = 5.
end type b_obj
type (b_obj),allocatable :: b(:)
integer,allocatable :: c(:)
integer :: i,n
n =
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 22:34 ---
Here is a better patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 163946)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 22:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > I posted a patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-09/msg00176.html.
>
> The patch fixes this pr.
Well, unfortunately the patch does not really fix the problem, but only defers
it. Th
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-07 10:42 ---
> I posted a patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-09/msg00176.html.
The patch fixes this pr.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45577
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 10:26 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Janus. I wonder whether it could be due to the fix PR fortran/45507; could
> you have a look?
Yes. This seems to be the same problem reported by Salvatore (cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortr
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 09:29 ---
Hi Janus. I wonder whether it could be due to the fix PR fortran/45507; could
you have a look?
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
