http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-09 13:41:16 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 9 13:41:12 2010
New Revision: 165223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165223
Log:
2010-10-09 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 10:38:45 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 2 10:38:42 2010
New Revision: 164901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164901
Log:
2010-10-02 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 20:22 ---
As you might have guessed, the error is with regards to the arguments of MAX
which are A1 and A2.
The arguments are defined as BT_UNKNOWN, cf. in intrinsics.c:
add_sym_1m (max, GFC_ISYM_MAX, CLASS_ELEMENTAL,
