http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #44 from Hans-Werner Boschmann boschmann at tp1 dot
physik.uni-siegen.de 2011-01-03 12:55:53 UTC ---
I've run my project on R168414, there are no error messages so far. Thank you
all for making this fix, this bug has bothered me for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #43 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02 21:27:48 UTC ---
Hans, does r168302 fix the problem for you, or do you still get Component not
found errors?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #37 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 08:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
(In reply to comment #35)
Yes, I think I know what's going on. One way to fix it is the following:
I managed to get an ICE with your version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #38 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
12:22:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22856
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22856
testcase, ICE with patch in comment #35
(In reply to comment #37)
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #39 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 13:18:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
I managed to get an ICE with your version (sym == NULL)
No, that's not possible. My version (i.e. comment #35) is inserted at a
slightly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #40 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
17:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Ok, I get it. Sorry about the misconception. Feel free to commit the patch in
comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #41 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 18:53:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
Feel free to commit the patch in
comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I take care of it?
Please, you did the hard work - it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #42 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 21:21:56 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 28 21:21:53 2010
New Revision: 168302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168302
Log:
2010-12-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #36 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-27
22:18:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
Yes, I think I know what's going on. One way to fix it is the following:
I managed to get an ICE with your version (sym ==
12 matches
Mail list logo
