[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

2010-10-26 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

2010-10-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2010-10-26 15:09:37 UTC --- Janus, See comment #2. The problem is tauc is used before it is initialized. This is a bogus bug report.

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

2010-10-26 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

2010-10-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-25 18:45:18 UTC --- 1) Remove the Tabs from your source. (2) Compile with -O2 -Wall -Wuninitialized -fcheck=all.

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

2010-10-25 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---