[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-17 12:31:57 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Fri Dec 17 12:31:54 2010 New Revision: 167978 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167978 Log: 2010-12-17 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-17 12:34:11 UTC --- r167978 fixes the rejects-valid part, i.e. comment #3. ToDo: ICE-on-invalid in comment #2.

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-14 08:36:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) @@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ gfc_get_sym_tree (const char *name, gfc_namespace if (ns == NULL) -ns = gfc_current_ns; +ns =

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-14 12:13:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) @@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ gfc_get_sym_tree (const char *name, gfc_namespace if (ns == NULL) -ns = gfc_current_ns; +ns =

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-14 18:30:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I agree that this is better, though it still causes some regressions. I will now test the following variant: Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 21:59:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Here is a reduced test case for the rejects-valid part, without CLASS and ISO_C_BINDING: Not sure if it's the perfectly right thing to do, but

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08 13:08:43 UTC --- Created attachment 22685 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22685 Test case

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.5.1, 4.6.0

[Bug fortran/46849] [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in BLOCK or SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|