https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Per comment #3, this PR should probably be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-10 21:09:40 UTC ---
Actually I think it would be best to reject polymorphic arrays altogether for
the 4.6 release, i.e. throw an error as soon as we encounter something like
class(t) :: x(4)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-10
21:16:27 UTC ---
Actually I think it would be best to reject polymorphic arrays altogether for
the 4.6 release, i.e. throw an error as soon as we encounter something
