http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-03-07 06:26:24 UTC ---
RTFM, I should have.
Thank you for your help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-03-04 18:58:06 UTC ---
Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid. You may very
well be correct, but please explain. I am not such a Fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-03-04 19:16:27 UTC ---
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:58:19PM +, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-04
19:39:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid.
You may very well be correct, but please explain. I am not such
