http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus ---
Actually, a future gfortran patch might again disable the support for the code
in comment 0 (original bug report) by doing interface checks.
That's not only in line with my interpretation of the standard but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:08:05 2013
New Revision: 199120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48858
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:05:40 2013
New Revision: 199119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48858
* decl.c (ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:03:48 2013
New Revision: 199118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48858
* decl.c (gf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Juno Krahn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juno.krahn at nih dot gov
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-25
15:37:35 UTC ---
For a (vaguely) related issue, see PR 53478.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code
--- Comment #11 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07
22:15:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 35161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07
22:14:15 UTC ---
See also discussion starting at
http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2008-December/002123.html
Fortran 2003 has in "16.1 Scope of global identifiers"
"Program units, common blocks, e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24
19:56:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Tobias, did comment #4/#5 implement #35161?
No. The original issue of this PR and of PR 35161 is unfixed. (I think they are
duplicates.)
The only change (c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-22
14:17:45 UTC ---
The OPTIONAL problem is solved by allowing OPTIONAL with -std=gnu (default) and
-std=f2008tr.
Regarding the original problem: I think I have convince myself that having two
procedures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-06
18:33:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 6 18:33:31 2011
New Revision: 173503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173503
Log:
Really commit:
2011-05-06 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-06
18:12:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri May 6 18:12:25 2011
New Revision: 173500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173500
Log:
2011-05-06 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #3 from Bill Long 2011-05-04 22:40:31 UTC
---
On 5/4/11 3:28 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
>
> (In reply to comment #1)
> [BIND(C) with OPTIONAL arguments]
>> The Intel and P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #1 from Bill Long 2011-05-03 21:51:29 UTC
---
As an aside, the code in the Description is a "work-around" to avoid using the
TR 29113 feature that allows Optional arguments. This would be the preferred
code in the future:
> cat ckne
18 matches
Mail list logo
