http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
15:27:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:27:24 2011
New Revision: 175028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175028
Log:
PR fortran/49103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
15:28:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:28:21 2011
New Revision: 175029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175029
Log:
PR fortran/49103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-13
08:41:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
This untested hack is an attempt to avoid reverting my patch
Submitted version of the workaround patch 4.6:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31
11:54:23 UTC ---
Smaller, self-contained testcase:
! PR fortran/49103
! { dg-do run }
integer :: a(2), b(2), i, j
open (10, status='scratch')
do j = 1, 2
a = (/ 0, 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-31
13:28:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24402
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24402
gcc46-pr49103.patch
While micha's patch is the way to go for the trunk, it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-28
11:08:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Ugh, the problem is that first cunrolli unrolls the loop, so we get among
other things parm.9 initialized for printing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-05-28 17:56:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
My understanding is: It's a middle-end bug, which got exposed by Rev. 169083,
but which can occur also with other C, C++ or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23
07:35:48 UTC ---
Ugh, the problem is that first cunrolli unrolls the loop, so we get among other
things parm.9 initialized for printing fgrades_35, then
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-22
11:07:19 UTC ---
I would say look if -fno-whole-file works (or -fno-inline) or alternatively
watch out for not properly merged DECLs. ISTR some issues with module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-21
21:21:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 24322
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24322
reduced test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-21
23:11:01 UTC ---
Reverting revision 169083 on trunk fixes this pr (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01442.html for its motivation).
Further reduced
16 matches
Mail list logo
