http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-11
09:16:08 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Sep 11 09:16:03 2011
New Revision: 178757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178757
Log:
2011-09-11 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-10
14:07:01 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Sep 10 14:06:57 2011
New Revision: 178748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178748
Log:
2011-09-10 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06
18:50:50 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jul 6 18:50:46 2011
New Revision: 175929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175929
Log:
2011-07-06 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-28
18:59:06 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jun 28 18:59:04 2011
New Revision: 175594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175594
Log:
2011-06-28 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27
19:02:12 UTC ---
A patch suggested by comment #4 fixes the failure.
Regression-testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21
08:58:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think gfortran's convention is - and also TR 29113 requires - that the
addr_expr is not NULL if the variable is allocated - even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21
09:30:32 UTC ---
Actually, thinking about it: RESHAPE(allocatable_array, shape) is *not*
allocatable.
trans-expr.c has:
147 if (!sym-attr.pointer !sym-attr.allocatable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-06-20 20:04:47 UTC ---
the difference (I think) seems to be in the present check that has become
if (data != 0B (integer(kind=4)[0:] * restrict) data-data != 0B)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
11 matches
Mail list logo
