[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-09-04 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-09-04 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-04 10:49:18 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Sep 4 10:49:13 2011 New Revision: 178509 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178509 Log: 2011-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-09-04 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-31 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 11:28:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) gfortran-4.7 -c module.f90 gfortran-4.7 program.f90 What about gfortran-4.7 program.f90 module.o? AFAIK there is not object in the *.mod

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-30 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-30 17:09:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) And indeed it seems to fix the segfault. ... and regtests cleanly. Unfortunately, there is one more complication: When compiling the two files

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-30 17:24:31 UTC --- gfortran-4.7 -c module.f90 gfortran-4.7 program.f90 What about gfortran-4.7 program.f90 module.o? AFAIK there is not object in the *.mod files.

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-29 17:34:02 UTC --- Why setting this pr as unconfirmed?

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-29 17:39:01 UTC --- Oops. Did I do this? Sorry, it was not intentional ... Apparently this happens while changing the summary(?).

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-29 18:17:50 UTC --- (r171654?). Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's test case has none): Sorry to be such a nuisance, but it

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 18:29:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (r171654?). Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's test case has none): Sorry to be such a

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

2011-08-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 19:28:42 UTC --- Well, the obvious patch (based on Tobias' debugging) would be: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c === ---