http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #3 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com 2011-09-01
07:18:30 UTC ---
Hi Janus,
that seems quite to the point and it is much more straightforward than
my (minimal)
adjustment. Thanks.
The reason I brought this is that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 11:28:35 UTC ---
Unfortunately the patch in comment #2 did not survive the regression test. It
fails at least on:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_10.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31 19:31:10 UTC ---
Ok, here is one thing that could be easily done. Preliminary patch, not
regtested. Does this sound like an improvement?
Index: gcc/fortran/match.c
