http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 19:17:03 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Oct 16 19:16:59 2011
New Revision: 180061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180061
Log:
2011-10-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:23:52 UTC ---
Here is a better version which is regression-free:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:57:40 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Sep 29 11:57:35 2011
New Revision: 179345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179345
Log:
2011-09-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:14:03 UTC ---
Comment #0 is fixed with r179345.
I noticed that in 'resolve_formal_arglist' there are two separate checks for
procedure dummies in elemental procedures (for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-28 21:40:30 UTC ---
This patch causes one testsuite failure on elemental_args_check_2.f90, due to a
slightly changed error message.
