http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-10
09:32:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jan 10 09:32:29 2012
New Revision: 183057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183057
Log:
2012-01-10 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-09
19:53:32 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 9 19:53:27 2012
New Revision: 183030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183030
Log:
2012-01-09 Harald Anlauf
Tobias Bur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:14:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If this means writing
>
> Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE).
>
> to stderr (which is where the backtrace dump goes)
> before the actual backtrace, this wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:13:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 25905
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25905
Patch the reproduce desired behavior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-18 19:34:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also
> > to stderr.
>
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > So to get back
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-18 06:41:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, thanks for pointing out I was not precise enough.
> While "reducing" the problem, I forgot that the difference
> lies in where the line
>
> > > Floa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-17 20:17:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > A fatal error occurred! Backtrace for this error:
> > #0 0x80588BF in _gfortrani_show_backtrace at backtrace.c:261
> > #1 0x80494B7 in _gfortrani_backtr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
12 matches
Mail list logo