[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2012-01-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-10 09:32:34 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jan 10 09:32:29 2012 New Revision: 183057 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183057 Log: 2012-01-10 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2012-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-09 19:53:32 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 9 19:53:27 2012 New Revision: 183030 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183030 Log: 2012-01-09 Harald Anlauf Tobias Bur

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2012-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-12-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-12-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-23 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:14:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > If this means writing > > Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE). > > to stderr (which is where the backtrace dump goes) > before the actual backtrace, this wo

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-23 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-23 20:13:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25905 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25905 Patch the reproduce desired behavior

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-18 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-18 19:34:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also > > to stderr. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > So to get back

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-17 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-18 06:41:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, thanks for pointing out I was not precise enough. > While "reducing" the problem, I forgot that the difference > lies in where the line > > > > Floa

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-17 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-17 20:17:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > A fatal error occurred! Backtrace for this error: > > #0 0x80588BF in _gfortrani_show_backtrace at backtrace.c:261 > > #1 0x80494B7 in _gfortrani_backtr

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

2011-11-17 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co