http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2013-01-07 23:36:50 UTC ---
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:16:13PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
(In reply to comment #2)
Or extremely complicated:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
16:03:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
allocate(i, stat=i)
1
Error: Stat-variable at (1) shall not be ALLOCATEd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-18 18:40:31 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:03:04PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Well, it is not. One can restrict one to the common case of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18
19:02:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Although I think this is equivalent to putting a bandaid
on a AK-47 bullet hole, here you go
Thanks for the patch. Only one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-18 19:49:32 UTC ---
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 07:02:25PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #4
