http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-29
13:10:26 UTC ---
Sebastien has now ask at c.l.f, cf.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ef3900ab261c5cd9
Suggested workaround/solution:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #10 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2011-11-29
14:33:08 UTC ---
Indeed this is a workaround that we will probably adopt.
I would say that although I partially disagree the choices made in the Fortran
Standards in this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #6 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2011-11-24
13:23:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
It should be buried in 16 Scope, association, and definition, but I need
some
time to extract it.
Ok, so did I. Here is what I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
14:04:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Within a scoping unit, identifiers of entities in the following classes:
(1) ..., abstract interfaces, generic interfaces, ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #8 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2011-11-24
15:58:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
Within a scoping unit, identifiers of entities in the following classes:
(1) ..., abstract
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2011-11-23
09:22:12 UTC ---
Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly. Because
if this is explicitly forbidden, we are wondering what the Fortran committee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23
10:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly.
For links to the standards see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #4 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2011-11-23
13:56:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
For links to the standards see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards
Ok thank you for this link, very useful.
I think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23
16:51:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
So basically you mean that in the gfortran implementation the subroutine name
is part of the scope this subroutine defines (which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
11 matches
Mail list logo
