https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 13:44:45 UTC ---
Note that, in a way, this 'double mangling' is not a bug but a feature.
It was introduced for PR 46313, in order to handle cases like the one below.
(There might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20
08:42:11 UTC ---
That that changing this will break the ABI. Thus, it can only be done when we
have to break the ABI. That will happen for the new array descriptor.
(This bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20 10:52:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
That that changing this will break the ABI. Thus, it can only be done when we
have to break the ABI. That will happen for the new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20
11:22:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I agree completely. However, once 4.7 is released, should we be excessively
pristine about ABI breakage in trunk? It is, after
