[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2013-06-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 03:29:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Please define fails. What is the error message you get? All procedure included in gfortran's runtime library are treated as intrinsic

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread pablomme at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #3 from pablomme pablomme at googlemail dot com 2012-02-22 03:32:14 UTC --- Please define fails. What is the error message you get? Namely: $ gfortran -o t test_etime_iface.f90 /scratch/pl275/ccyZ7sWC.o: In function `MAIN__':

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread pablomme at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #4 from pablomme pablomme at googlemail dot com 2012-02-22 03:40:12 UTC --- Adding EXTERNAL etime to the program gives: -- $ gfortran -o t test_etime_iface.f90 test_etime_iface.f90:9.15: EXTERNAL etime 1 Error:

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-02-22 03:49:15 UTC --- On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:32:14AM +, pablomme at googlemail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-02-22 04:16:21 UTC --- On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:40:12AM +, pablomme at googlemail dot com wrote: So ifort seems to agree with gfortran in its error messages

[Bug fortran/52333] Explicit etime interface should work

2012-02-21 Thread pablomme at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52333 --- Comment #7 from pablomme pablomme at googlemail dot com 2012-02-22 04:42:30 UTC --- What happens with all your compilers if you supply an explicit interface for say DSIN. For DSIN all of them behave like gfortran: -- $ cat test_dsin.f90