http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 08:48:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already
support
1) long symbol names (I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20 10:27:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Indeed, one can construct examples which exceed the length: Namely module
procedures or module variables. The problem is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20
10:58:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already support
1) long symbol names (I read somewhere that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-16
23:18:26 UTC ---
Someting as trivial as the following would perhaps already help (not tested):
Index: match.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
