[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

2015-11-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

2015-09-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

2015-09-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I agree that this PR can probably be closed. Closing as FIXED. Please file new PR(s) for new issue(s).

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

2015-09-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2014-01-10 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2014-01-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abensonca at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2014-01-09 Thread abensonca at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson abensonca at gmail dot com --- (In reply to janus from comment #10) (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one issue left

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2013-12-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2013-05-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2 ---

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function] warning

2013-03-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1