https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 19 20:06:41 2019
New Revision: 268096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268096=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-01-19 Thomas Koenig
Paul Thomas
PR fortran/56789
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion
> > that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense.
>
> Well, in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion
that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense.
The IBM manual is explicit about this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
I have asked in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/comp.lang.fortran$20contiguous$20dummy%7Csort:date/comp.lang.fortran/QiFkx8b48uw/wtQE9M_aFwAJ
.
Let's see what sort of answers there will be, apart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #18 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #11)
> > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #10)
> > > Even if that were allowed, the standard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
I think that the copy in/copy out might be rather easy to arrange.
Give me a couple of days.
Paul
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 22:01, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Of course, there should be a "return false;" in there as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
This would reject the obvious non-contiguous cases.
Index: interface.c
===
--- interface.c (Revision 264540)
+++ interface.c (Arbeitskopie)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|Wrong
12 matches
Mail list logo
