[Bug fortran/57711] Accepts non-matching invalid dummy procedure as actual argument

2020-01-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/57711] Accepts non-matching invalid dummy procedure as actual argument

2013-07-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch for PR40276 and this PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00132.html (approved). It fails for the test case http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00017.html (-

[Bug fortran/57711] Accepts non-matching invalid dummy procedure as actual argument

2013-06-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid,

[Bug fortran/57711] Accepts non-matching invalid dummy procedure as actual argument

2013-06-26 Thread kabanovdmitry at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Kabanov kabanovdmitry at gmail dot com --- @Dominique: a) I get the following error: make all gfortran -c vode.f gfortran -c fcns.f90 gfortran -c main.f90 main.f90:8.75: call vode(istate, lambda_fcn, dummy_jac,

[Bug fortran/57711] Accepts non-matching invalid dummy procedure as actual argument

2013-06-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57711 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dmitry Kabanov from comment #4) Regarding the bug in JAC/DUMMY_JAC: I think for one-dimensional arrays there is no difference between ASSUMED-SIZE and ASSUMED-SHAPE.