https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:03:30PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
>
> --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I get
>
> pr58904.f90:5:4:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The change occurred between revisions r242984 (2016-11-29, ICE) and r243219
(2016-12-03, errors), likely fixed by r243020 (pr78593) for gcc7 and r243485
for gcc6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I get
pr58904.f90:5:4:
r%b = b
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
pr58904.f90:3:2:
TYPE(mytype) FUNCTION create_sort_range(b) result(r)
1
Error: The type for function 'create_sor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> Draft patch:
Unfortunately this causes several regressions in the testsuite:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/asynchronous_1.f90 -O (test for errors, line 35)
FAIL: gfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Draft patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 242960)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
@@ -5962
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
