[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

2016-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 68889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

2016-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/ duplicate of pr71906?

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

2015-10-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

2014-06-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Regarding (a), see also https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-06/msg00113.html

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

2013-12-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Regarding (a): I think we should consider to simply use the same structure of arrays ("struct array_descr_info") also for scalars. Besides that it already exists, it is probably also sensible when we will hand