https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
Andre Vehreschild vehre at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gmx dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #5 from Antony Lewis antony at cosmologist dot info ---
The patch generated a SIGSEGV in test code (which works with ifort), but could
be another unrelated issue.
Here's another simple test case for the original issue:
program test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Antony, is it possible for you to try the patch in comment 2, in order to check
if it produces the expected runtime behavior for your code?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Consider the following simple test case:
implicit none
call sub1(test)
call sub2()
contains
subroutine sub1(dcl) ! accepted
character(len=*), target :: dcl
class(*), pointer :: ucp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
