http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #8 from Steve Chapel schapel at umich dot edu ---
Yes, it's a regression from earlier versions of gfortran. I have verified that
with the workaround, Nonmem 6.2.0 compiles and runs properly with optimization
using gfortran 4.8.1 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:15:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
The workaround should be obvious, but just encase
Reduced testcase
subroutine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:38:57PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Looks like an unguarded union access.
This is a regression from the time there was now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #2 from Steve Chapel steve.chapel at a2pg dot com ---
Created attachment 32216
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32216action=edit
included source code file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #1 from Steve Chapel steve.chapel at a2pg dot com ---
Created attachment 32215
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32215action=edit
source code file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
