https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 17 18:08:38 2015
New Revision: 219801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219801root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-17 Andre Vehreschild ve...@gmx.de
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 29 10:45:21 2014
New Revision: 219098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219098root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/60357
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original problem in comment 0 is fixed with r219098. Thanks to Anthony for
reporting this!
TODO: The segfault reported by Dominique in comment 4 and 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
Andre Vehreschild vehre at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gmx dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #9)
I just need to
figure, if allocating the component explicitly is valid in Fortran.
For sure. I think both the examples in comment 4 and 5 are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #11 from Andre Vehreschild vehre at gmx dot de ---
Hi Janus,
before you invest too much time into that: My current patch level produces
intermediate code as attached (for a slightly different program, also
attached).
I was solving
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #12 from Andre Vehreschild vehre at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34353
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34353action=edit
test_pr60357.f08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
program testerprog
use testmod
Type(A) :: Me
allocate(Me%y)
Me = A(X=1, y=2)
print *, Me%y
end program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The patch in comment 2 needs to be update to
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/primary.c2014-12-16 22:27:14.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/primary.c2014-12-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Note that while
program testerprog
use testmod
Type(A) :: Me
Me%y=2
print *, Me%x, Me%y
end program
gives at run time
1 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Draft patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/array.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/array.c(revision 208207)
+++ gcc/fortran/array.c(working copy)
@@
14 matches
Mail list logo
