http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00785.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2)
-Wunused-parameter is enabled by -Wall. I'm surprised that -Wextra is used
without -Wall, but it happens in the testsuite in more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-Wunused-parameter is not included in -Wall but is implied by -Wall -Wextra
would mean that the test case assumes that it it is implied by -Wextra only.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2)
-Wunused-parameter is enabled by -Wall. I'm surprised that -Wextra is used
without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #0)
The gfortran.dg/wextra_1.f test case assumes that -Wextra enables
-Wununused-parameter, but this does not happen. No warning is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
Thus, in GCC - whether Fortran or C - it is enabled with -Wextra, but only
if also -Wunused is used. The latter is implied by -Wall.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com ---
Am 09.05.2014 18:02, schrieb manu at gcc dot gnu.org:
I don't understand how it was working before. What is exactly the
command-line passed to that testcase?
the test passes just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #0)
The gfortran.dg/wextra_1.f test case assumes that -Wextra enables
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that the above code is broken in other ways:
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wextra will enable -Wunused-parameter, which is not what
should happen.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This builds gfortran and fixes the testcase, but I haven't tested it beyond
that.
Index: lang.opt
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
This builds gfortran and fixes the testcase, but I haven't tested it beyond
that.
Together with the patch in comment #10, of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
I think that if the order in which the handlers are executed matters,
something is too fragile in those handlers.
16 matches
Mail list logo
