https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 15 19:58:55 2016
New Revision: 238400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238400=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle
Marco Restelli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #9 from mrestelli ---
Here is a test; should compile and run without errors.
module m
implicit none
type, abstract :: t1
logical :: l
end type t1
type, extends(t1), abstract :: t2
integer :: i
end type t2
type,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I confirm that the patch in comment 5 allows the test to be compiled without
regression.
A test case showing that the code executes as expected is needed to avoid to
replace reject-valid with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #7 from mrestelli ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
> I tested the patch. No regressions. Works as advertised.
>
> I will submit the patch for approval and see if we can commit it.
>
> Thanks!
:-)
(first time I try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #5 from mrestelli ---
I think the following patch could solve the problem:
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c(revision 238083)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125
--- Comment #2 from mrestelli mrestelli at gmail dot com ---
I can not say 100% that the code is correct, but at least reading 8.6
The SELECT TYPE Construct of The Fortran 2003 Handbook I don't see
why it shouldn't.
Notice that: among rules and
11 matches
Mail list logo