[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-11-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Nov 4 20:00:19 2015 New Revision: 229777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229777=gcc=rev Log: 2015-01-25 Paul Thomas Backported from trunk.

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 25 21:31:12 2015 New Revision: 229303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229303=gcc=rev Log: 2015-01-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/67171 *

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-21 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Mikael, yes, you are absolutely right. I mixed those two up, sorry. My head is in CUDA programming currently and that's keeping it quite busy. Feel free to review though :-) Regards, Andre

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-21 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-20 Thread vehre at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild --- Hi Paul, please compare: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same. - Andre On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 + "pault at gcc dot gnu.org"

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #4) > Hi Paul, > > please compare: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html > > to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same. > > - Andre > >

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-20 Thread vehre at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild --- Hi Paul, No it's not, but the patch for the other pr addresses a lot of things in the allocate. Mostly about functions returning class objects, but I remember to have changed some of the things your

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

2015-08-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0