https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Am I correct to summarize (simplify?) your expectation (interpretation as:
use the overloaded assignment if the lhs and rhs are conforming, otherwise use
the intrinsic assignment?
If yes, what the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Baldwin ---
In 7.2.1.4 of my copy of the standard it states:
"A subroutine defines the defined assignment x1 = x2 if"
...
"(5) either
(a) the ranks of x1 and x2 match those of d1 and d2 or
(b) the subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3
