https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7)
> What progress do you expect? IBM long double does not support non-default
> rounding. This will be fixed when PPC64LE long double defaults to IEEE 128
> bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7)
> What progress do you expect? IBM long double does not support non-default
> rounding. This will be fixed when PPC64LE long double defaults to IEEE 128
> bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
What progress do you expect? IBM long double does not support non-default
rounding. This will be fixed when PPC64LE long double defaults to IEEE 128 bit
floating point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)
> How about with this? I'm trying to come as close as possible to the exact
> sequence of fe.etround() calls as the Fortran front-end and runtime library
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67531
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
