https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
--- Comment #2 from John Donners ---
Hello Dominique,
thank you for your reaction. Yes, I should have added the output and my
expectation. I expected to see the following:
Actual argument, allocatable, lbound= 3 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
--- Comment #4 from John Donners ---
I think that you meant an assumed-shape array with
real,dimension(:,:,:) :: a
The assumed-shape array is described in section 5.5.8.3 of the draft standard
and it explicitly says that the lower bound is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
--- Comment #6 from John Donners ---
I did have a look at the gcc code to see if I could change this, but I don't
know where to start. I did see the tests for the assumed rank bounds and I
could help to change those.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I think that you meant an assumed-shape array with ...
Indeed! Thanks for the pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> AFAICT the (l\u)bound have been set by r190098. Mikael CCed.
I think that revision just made scalarization work.
For the calls with the dim= argument, I
10 matches
Mail list logo
