https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Oct 30 17:00:23 2015
New Revision: 229592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-30 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Oct 30 16:26:59 2015
New Revision: 229588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229588&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-30 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/68154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I'll change this to gcc_unreachable() before I commit the change.
I agree.
> The if-branch is my fix for PR 65429, and the else-if-branch
> restores the old code.
It is what I understood.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:59:54PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
>
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > + else
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> + else
> + clen = 1;
Why clen=1? When is this branch accessed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:56:37PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
>
> Dominique d'Humieres changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68154
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
