https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #16 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Jan 25 11:36:11 2016
New Revision: 232790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232790=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-25 Dominique d'Humieres
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #15 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Jan 24 13:13:38 2016
New Revision: 232776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232776=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-24 Dominique d'Humieres
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Jan 24 13:12:44 2016
New Revision: 232775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232775=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-24 Dominique d'Humieres
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4
--- Comment #13 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
>
> With revision r216098 (2014-10-10) it gives
This seems a problem with the buffering of errors that Fortran does. I might
have missed some cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:01:19PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
>
> --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> For some reason, the ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
For some reason, the ICE requires to use at least -O.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> For some reason, the ICE requires to use at least -O.
yes, I noticed this as well, I think this is one of the fortran frontend
optimization passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> yes, I noticed this as well, I think this is one of the fortran frontend
> optimization passes.
Indeed, no ICE with '-O -fno-frontend-optimize'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The reduced test with only one error
MODULE neb_utils
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
TYPE neb_var_type
REAL(KIND=dp), DIMENSION(:, :), POINTER :: xyz, int, wrk
END TYPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Even further reduced
MODULE neb_utils
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
TYPE neb_var_type
REAL(KIND=dp), DIMENSION(:, :), POINTER :: xyz, int, wrk
END TYPE neb_var_type
17 matches
Mail list logo