[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 37012 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37012=edit Patch I don't expect this to work but it points at the problem. The call to backtrace_create_state() assumes

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- (gdb) r Starting program: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/backtrace_1.exe warning: Private mapping of shared library text was not specified by the executable; setting a breakpoint in a

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin --- *** Bug 68742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is this PR fixed by revision r231485?

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-11 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-11 6:45 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > Is this PR fixed by revision r231485? No. It just fixed the undefined __sync function warnings from HP ld. The above revision was

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2015-12-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > WORKSFORME (x86_64-apple-darwin14) and for others (see x86_64-apple-darwin14). > Is this a regression? If yes, what was your last working revision and did > anything change in your system: new