[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #26 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37166=edit lib

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #35 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- read_input_mod is built from the source file read_input_mod.f90. It's the one with the bug

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #27 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37167 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37167=edit driver

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 kottinge at utk dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37141|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #15 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37155 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37155=edit m12

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #14 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37154 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37154=edit m11

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #13 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37153 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37153=edit m10

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #12 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37152 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37152=edit m9

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #4 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37144 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37144=edit m1

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #3 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37143 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37143=edit mod

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #25 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37165 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37165=edit m22

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yeah that's what the bug is. The only problem with the file or at least > what prevents it from compiling is the missing variable declaration > on line 2648, but instead of saying there is a

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #20 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37160=edit m17

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #19 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37159=edit m16

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #18 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37158 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37158=edit m15

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #16 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37156 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37156=edit m13

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #17 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37157 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37157=edit m14

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #29 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37169 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37169=edit source file with missing variable from only list

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Sorry but what you provide is useless for the time I want to spend on this PR (you should use 'tar' for many files, so far son_struct_mod.mod is missing). Please provide a reduced test.

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > read_input_mod is built from the source file read_input_mod.f90. > It's the one with the bug I get an ICE when compiling this file SUBROUTINE READ_INPUT(s,input,inp_lines) 1 internal compiler

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #39 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37171 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37171=edit calc_param_mod

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #30 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Okay, I uploaded files for a working eaxmple. Trying to compile with: gfortran -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -pthread -I/usr/lib/openmpi/lib -L/usr//lib -L/usr/lib/openmpi/lib -lmpi_f90 -lmpi_f77

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #32 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37170 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37170=edit m26

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #5 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37145 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37145=edit m2

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #6 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37146 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37146=edit m3

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #7 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37147 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37147=edit m4

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #8 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37148 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37148=edit m5

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #22 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37162 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37162=edit m19

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #24 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37164 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37164=edit m21

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #23 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37163 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37163=edit m20

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #21 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37161 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37161=edit m18

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #33 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- I uploaded soln_struct_mod.mod I don't want to spend a lot of time on this either, and it's a complicated project and figuring out the minimal code to reproduce the error is likely to take a long

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #37 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Yeah that's what the bug is. The only problem with the file or at least what prevents it from compiling is the missing variable declaration on line 2648, but instead of saying there is a missing

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #9 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37149 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37149=edit m6

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #10 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37150 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37150=edit m7

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #11 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Created attachment 37151 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37151=edit m8

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- No read_input_mod.mod. Please work on a reduced test showing the issue. If you cannot do it at least provide a compressed tar of you project. So far we are both wasting our time!-(

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #40 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- I attached calc_param_mod.f90 (it's just a bunch of variable declarations). The missing variable declartion is commented out on line 2648 it's max_line_len2

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69064] Unhelpful error message when a module variable was not included in the only list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #1 from kottinge at utk dot edu --- Instead of gcc in the compile command it should be gfortran.