https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5
--- Comment #16 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regressions before closing as fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #14 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Jul 22 15:01:48 2016
New Revision: 238646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238646=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Jul 22 14:12:59 2016
New Revision: 238644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238644=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Jul 22 13:15:31 2016
New Revision: 238640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238640=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-22 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regression reports before applying to gcc-*-branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:07:47 2016
New Revision: 238347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238347=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #7)
> Hi Karl,
>
> (In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> > With the patch I posted earlier today and code in comment #1, I see
>
> which patch are you referring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #6 from nathanael.huebbe at informatik dot uni-hamburg.de ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> With the patch I posted earlier today and code in comment #1, I see
>
> gfc7 -c a.f90
> a.f90:14:30:
>
> print*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #4)
> ICE for both release and experimental :
>
>
> $ gfortran-6 pr70842.f90
> f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_add_component_ref, at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #3 from nathanael.huebbe at informatik dot uni-hamburg.de ---
This is getting even nastier. As it turns out, even though the code I gave
above compiles, it does not produce correct results. To be precise, if I use a
routine like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
16 matches
Mail list logo