https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 19:34:59 2016
New Revision: 240635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 28 23:12:23 2016
New Revision: 238842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/71067
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch in comment 7 fixes the ICE without regression.
Steve,
Will it help if I do the packaging or do you prefer to do it yourself?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #0)
> With a missing parameter attribute, or value not initialized :
>
> $ cat z1.f90
> program p
>integer :: i = 0
>integer :: z(2)
>data z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Thus I would consider the PR as 4.8/4.9/5/6/7 regression, do you agree?
Yes, the change occurred between revisions r190641 (2012-08-24, error) and
r190786 (2012-08-29, ICE). The backtrace is
* thre
