[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Dec 12 18:54:54 2016 New Revision: 243580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243580=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-12 Janus Weil PR fortran/78392

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- As noted by Dominique, the problem here has originally been introduced by r126826.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Working patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00188.html.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > Likely a duplicate of pr42359. Agreed.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Likely a duplicate of pr42359.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) > Related to pr42122? Don't think so.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As an alternative to removing the assert, one could possibly prevent SAVEd > variables in the main PROGRAM from being declared as "static" (which might > also cure the performance regressions that

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > As an alternative to removing the assert, one could possibly prevent SAVEd > variables in the main PROGRAM from being declared as "static" (which might > also

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #0) > On trunk, the error looks like this: > > internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at > fortran/trans-array.c:5979 This line is an assert,

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code