[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed May 17 18:09:48 2017 New Revision: 248166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248166=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-17 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu May 11 20:40:49 2017 New Revision: 247930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247930=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-11 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/78659

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) The case that ICEs needs to have an error check in io.c (gfc_resolve_dt). I have found the location and now need to build the error check.

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10) > Agree, I will look further Janus, unless you are digging into it already? I'm currently looking into PR 78661. Would be great if you could take care

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > I think this needs to be reopened. As mentioned in comment 0, the original > test case in itself is valid, but is invalidated by adding an I/O statement > that

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Dec 6 17:13:31 2016 New Revision: 243308 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243308=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-06 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/78659

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have the ICE resolved, but also note that the Fortran 95 standard has the constraint on namelist statements and F2003 does not. Constraint - namelist-group-object shall not be an array dummy argument with