[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2018-05-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2018-01-19 Thread vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 Vladimir Fuka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2018-01-18 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) > Ok. Btw, the draft version of the F15 standard linked from the gfortran wiki > is: > > http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/15/15-007.pdf > > (from December 2014).

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #5) > I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We > will have to work from the draft standard itself. Ok. Btw, the

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-14 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We will have to work from the draft standard itself. Paul On 14 December 2016 at 20:36, paul.richard.thomas at

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-14 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janus, Yes there is one - I had it open but somehow provided the link to the wrong one... Paul On 14 December 2016 at 19:20, janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-14 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr > with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf This document

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #1) > +1 > > Can you remind us which F15 features we have already? > > On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see: > * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type). > *

[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015

2016-12-13 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|