https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 30 07:52:55 2017
New Revision: 248636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248636=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 20:29:19 2017
New Revision: 244549
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244549=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:16:20 2016
New Revision: 243860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243860=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/78866
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Diagnose assumed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The parallel isn't needed, and we ICE both explicitly mapped and implicitly
mapped assumed-size arrays. This is a bug in the standard, it doesn't restrict
mapping from mapping assumed-size arrays, even when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Older versions down to at least 5.4.1 give :
$ gfortran-7-20161023 -fopenmp -c z1.f90
z1.f90:4:0:
!$omp target
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault