https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
--- Comment #10 from DIL ---
Thanks for fixing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue May 9 20:55:38 2017
New Revision: 247818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-09 Janus Weil
PR fortran/79311
* res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #6)
> The regtest went pretty well, although I'm seeing these three failures:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
> FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> This draft patch fixes the ICE on comment 0 and comment 4:
>
> [..]
>
> Regtesting now ...
The regtest went pretty well, although I'm seeing these three failu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
