[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-03-14 Thread damian at sourceryinstitute dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-02-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 19 19:59:20 2017 New Revision: 245582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245582&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/79447 * decl.c (gfc_se

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-02-14 Thread damian at sourceryinstitute dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson --- Hi Paul, Thanks for the updates. My son loves to host garage sales so let us know if you're getting rid of the "stuff" and we'll drop by. :) Safe travels. Damian

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-02-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Damian, Thanks for the report. I am back in France for a couple of days, tidying up things like utility company contracts and the pile of "stuff" that I left in a friend's garage. I'll get onto this as soon

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-02-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79447] [F08] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid internal subprogram in a submodule

2017-02-09 Thread damian at sourceryinstitute dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- I just tested with a more recent build (7.0.1 dated 20170205) and see the same behavior.