https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
r274996 finally correctly disabled -Wstringop-overflow (and other
language-specific middle-end warnings) for Fortran (and other languages they're
not meant for) so that might explain why the fails have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ---
Between 20190828 (r274994) and 20190829 (r275034), the failures on
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit) went away:
-FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_3.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
-FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Anyway, WAITING for Fortran folks to settle the wrong-code dispute.
AFAIU the code is valid Fortran
x(4:1:-1) = x((/1,3,2,4/))
x((/1,3,2,4/)) use a temporary array of size 4 and
tmp(1)=x(1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
10 matches
Mail list logo
